2000~2016年,重庆城乡综合演算的各类民生数据人均值持续明显增长,2016年居民收入为2000年的6。86倍,总消费为6。11倍,积蓄为10。47倍。物质消费比重较明显下降4。31个百分点,非物消费比重较明显增高4。31个百分点,消费结构出现较大升级变化。但居民收入比从58。97%极显著下降至38。81%,居民消费率从48。91%极显著下降至28。71%,“十二五”期间继续下降。尤其应注意居民收入年均增长极显著低于财政收入年增9。78个百分点,居民消费支出年均增长极显著低于财政支出年增9。22个百分点。居民积蓄率从17。05%持续显著升高至26。02%,反过来对消费需求的抑制作用加重。居民收入、积蓄地区差逐渐缩小,但居民总消费地区差继续扩大;居民收入、总消费城乡比逐渐缩小,而居民积蓄城乡比持续扩大。
<<From 2000 to 2016,the per capita value of all types of people’s livelihood data in Chongqing’s urban and rural comprehensive calculation evidently continued to increase. The residents’ income in 2016 was 6.86 times that of 2000,the total consumption was 6.11 times and the amassment was 10.47 times. The proportion of the residents’ material consumption certainly fell over 4.31 percentage points and the proportion of the residents’ immaterial consumption certainly rose over 4.31 percentage points,showing a certain upgrading change of the consumption structure. But the residents’ income rate significantly fell from 58.97% to 38.81% and the residents’ consumption rate significantly fell from 48.91% to 28.71%,it continued to fall while the Twelfth Five-Year Plan period. In particular,the average annual growth of the residents’ income was significantly 9.78 percentage points lower than the annual growth of fiscal revenues and the average annual growth of the residents’ consumption expenditure was significantly 9.22 percentage points lower than the annual growth of fiscal expenditure. The residents’ amassment rate certainly continued to rise from 17.05% to 26.02%,which in return aggravate the inhibition of consumption demand. the inhibition of consumption demand. The regional disparity of the residents’ income and amassment continued to be reduced,but that of the residents’ total consumption continued to be extended;the urban and rural ratio of the residents’ income and total consumption continued to be reduced,but that of the residents’ amassment continued to be extended.
<<Keywords: | Residents' IncomePeople's Life DevelopmentMaterial ConsumptionNonmaterial ConsumptionLivelihood Development Index |