您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    社会保险费征收体制改革研究报告

    摘要

    社会保险费征收的核心问题是“用什么标准征收”和“用什么方式征收”。在相当长的时期内,我国社会保险费征收模式属于综合征收模式,没有统一的征收主体。长期以来,我国社会保险费征收体制在实际运行中主要存在以下问题:部门间职责不清晰;部门间衔接运行效率低和成本高并存;社会保险基金过渡户损害社会保险基金的有效使用;税务机关征收社会保险费的自觉性有待提高;社会保险经办机构信息化建设滞后;社保经办机构核准社会保险缴费基数难度大。经过评估发现,社保税务双部门混合征收体制为我国社会保险基金的征收做出了巨大贡献,为社会保险制度的可持续发展奠定了物质基础。宏观数据分析显示,社保经办机构征收和税务机关征收社会保险费的效率与效果,总体上看不存在压倒性的显著差异。分类数据分析显示,三种不同类型社会保险费征收模式的效率与效果存在一定的差异。社会保险费征收主体不统一已经产生诸多问题,多数被调研者认为国家应当尽早明确统一征收部门,实现全国社会保险费的统一征收。社会保险费征收机构统一是一项复杂的系统工作,需要统筹谋划征收体制和社会保险制度(重点是基本养老保险制度)的协同改革。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    The core questions concerning the collecting of social insurance are “what are the standards of collecting?”and “what are the ways of collecting?”Over quite a long time,the collecting of social insurance in China falls into a comprehensive mode with the absence of a unified subject of collecting. The problems exposed in the existing collection system are:ambiguity in responsibilities between sectors,coexistence of low efficiency and high cost when sectors joining together in operation;the effective use of social insurance fund damaged by transitional social insurance fund,consciousness of taxazation authorities in collecting social insurance to be enhanced,informatization construction of social insurance administrations lagged behind,and difficulties in the approval of basic rate of social insurance by social insurance administrations. Based on the assessment,we believe that the mixed-collecting system by social insurance administrations and taxazation authorities has made great contributions to the collecting of social insurance fund,and laid a material base for the sustainable development of social insurance system. According to macro data analysis,there is no overwhelming significant difference in efficiency and effect of the collecting between social insurance administrations and taxazation authorities.However,analysis of categorical data shows there are some differences in efficiency and effect of three different collecting modes. The different subjects of collecting gives rise to many problems. Many of the interviewees suggested a unifed collecting institution should be put in place to collect social insurance nationwide. The unification of collecting institutions will be a complex systematic work calling for efforts made to the coordinated reforms on social insurance collection system and social insurance system(with an emphasis on basic pension insurance system).

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    王延中:顾问:李培林、蔡昉;组长:王延中;成员:张翼、汪德华、房连泉、丁赛、程杰、刘小珉、单大圣、龙玉其、江翠萍、宁亚芳、王国洪、马葵、元林君、刘芳;秘书:宁亚芳。执笔人:王延中、宁亚芳、龙玉其、王国洪。本报告为课题组集体成果。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告