Previous research on trust repair primarily focused on how different types of violations and repair efforts influence trust recovery from transgressors’ perspective. Yet few research examined the characteristics of trustors，no mention from the dual perspectives（i.e.，both the perspectives of transgressor and of trustor）. This study aimed at the trust violation caused by an employee’ job-hopping which has broken his promise. We selected 383 undergraduates as participants and adopted a 2（trustor’s implicit theories of personality：entity vs. incremental theorist）× 2（transgressor’s strategies of apology：internal vs. external attribution）between-subject experimental design in order to examine how the trustor’s implicit theories of personality and transgressors’ strategies of apology influence the trust recovery. The findings showed that the apology of internal attribution was more effective to repair trust than that of external attribution and that this effect was much more significant when the trust was an entity theorist，relative to an incremental theorist. The findings supported the cultural differences in trust repair and shed implications on both theoretical research and practices on trust repair.