传统行政理论一般认为,应通过规则的完善尽量避免行政过程中的自由裁量权。然而,现代社会日益增加的不确定性使得人们不得不调整对自由裁量权的认识和应对。如何在当代的语境下实现对自由裁量权的问责,是后科层时代公共行政需要回答的重要问题,而新公共管理理论和实验主义治理对自由裁量的理解则分别代表着两种出路。本文试图通过美国纽约市和辛辛那提市的警察制度改革来比较这两种理论提出的不同应对方案,并阐述两种方案背后的政治哲学基础,也对当代中国的政府治理实践的镜鉴做了讨论。
<<According to classical administrative theory,administrative discretion should be resolved by rule making.However,the increasing uncertaintiesin modern society have led people to begin to rethink the issue of discretion.How to understand and deal with discretion is a core difference between bureaucratic administration and post-bureaucratic administration.New public management theory and experimental governance,based on different philosophical foundations,offer two different solutions to retain discretionary accountability.This article compares these two solutions based on cases of policing reforms in New York City and Cincinnati.This is followed by a discussion of practical prospects for Chinese governance.
<<