您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    论雄安新区与中国道路

    • 作者:陶一桃出版日期:2017年12月
    • 报告大小:1.04MB
    • 报告字数:13949 字所属丛书:
    • 所属图书:中国经济特区研究(2017年第...

    摘要

    传统的“5+2”特区到自贸区、雄安新区,都是在改革开放不同时期与阶段中承担不同的先行先试使命,实现国家发展战略的一项制度安排;都是实现社会转型的一条路径;都是加速实现现代化的一条“捷径”;都是对中国道路实质与内涵的探索与丰富。这条发展道路在不断形成中国经济区域增长极的同时,也逐步实现中国社会的均衡发展、协调发展与全面发展。从中国社会改革开放的逻辑起点和路径选择来看,非均衡发展是占主导地位的战略选择。但是,随着越来越多的特区、开发区、新区、自贸区的建立及市场经济的普遍建立,威廉姆逊倒“U”形假说所预测的状况逐渐显现出来,而雄安新区的建立在一定程度上印证了这一假说。雄安新区的建立是梯度发展与反梯度发展路径选择的有机结合,它不仅会以实践验证中国式的梯度发展与反梯度发展相结合的路径是富有制度绩效的,而且还会在深化改革的进程中诠释中国道路的独特性与创造性。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    The traditional “5+2” special economic zones to free trade zones and Xiongan New Area undertake their different missions of early and pilot implementation in the different times and phases in China’s reform and opening-up,and they are an institutional arrangement for the realization of national development strategy,a path selection for the realization of social transformation,a “shortcut” for the acceleration of realizing modernization and the exploration for and enrichment of the substance and connotation of China’s road. Towards this development road,the economic growth poles in China have been formed,and meanwhile,the balanced development,harmonious development and integrated development have been gradually realized. From the perspectives of logical starting point and path selection of China’s social reform and opening-up,uneven development is the predominant strategic choice. However,with more and more special economic zones,development zones,new areas and free trade zones established and the market economy generally established,the situations predicted by Williamson’s reverse-U assumption are revealed,and to some extent,the establishment of Xiongan New Area proves such assumption. The establishment of Xiongan New Area is the dynamic integration of gradient development with Chinese style and the path selection of anti-gradient development,and it not only will practically verify that the path of combining the gradient development with Chinese style and anti-gradient development will have impressive institutional performances but also will interpret the peculiarity and creativity of China’s road during the process of deepening the reform.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    陶一桃:陶一桃,女,黑龙江哈尔滨人,深圳大学党委副书记、纪委书记,经济学博士,教授,博士生导师,教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地——深圳大学中国经济特区研究中心主任。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告