我国对涉外知识产权侵权案件的管辖遵循地域性管辖原则,但该原则在实践中日益显示出其弊端,导致我国法院在管辖权行使问题上缺乏弹性应对能力,不利于增强我国在国际竞争中的知识产权竞争力。建设创新型国家要求我国法院借鉴美国等国家做法,适度扩张对涉外知识产权案件的管辖权。本文尝试提出我国法院在审理不同类型涉外知识产权案件时突破地域性管辖的司法管辖规则,并对“平行诉讼”及“不方便法院原则”的司法适用进行了探讨。
<<In China,intellectual property infringement litigations follow the principle of territoriality which presents gradually its limits in practice.In fact,it makes that our courts lack of flexibility in exercising its jurisdiction,which is not beneficial for national intellectual property competitiveness in the international competition.The purpose of constructing innovative state necessitates that our courts to learn from other countries as the United States and to extend national jurisdiction in dealing with intellectual property cases involving an extraterritorial element.This article proposes some rules of jurisdiction that can bypass the principle of territoriality,and also discuss the application of“parallel proceedings”and“Doctrine of Forum Non Conveniens”.
<<Keywords: | Transnational Intellectual Property DisputesTerritorialityParallel ProceedingsForum Non Conveniens |