您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    数据新型财产权构建及其体系

    摘要

    随着大数据的出现以及数据经济的兴起,数据日益成为举足轻重的新型资产,与此伴随的是有关个人信息和数据资产的利益关系变得越来越复杂。本文认为,传统法律架构在调整个人信息和数据利益关系方面,可资援用的有立足用户个人信息保护的人格权保护模式,有基于个人信息授权利用合同(用户协议)的债的关系模式,还有简单的行政管理模式。但是,这些方式无论是单独还是结合起来,即使做出一定的变通,也不能真正适应当前数据经济利益关系合理调整的需求。当前,在数据经济的环境下,个人信息和数据利益关系的法律建构,应与数据经济的结构本质,特别是其双向动态特点紧密结合,进而采取一种更加复杂的权利配置方式。数据经济及其数据资产化趋势推动了数据财产化的发展,一种新型财产权形态呼之欲出,但相关理论存在进一步完善的必要。从体系上说,应该在区分个人信息和数据资产的基础上,进行两个阶段的权利建构:首先,对于用户,应在个人信息或者说初始数据的层面同时配置人格权益和财产权益;其次,对于数据经营者(企业),在数据资产化背景下,基于数据经营和利益驱动的机制需求,应分别配置数据经营权和数据资产权。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    With the emergence of big data and data economy,data is increasingly becoming a new type of property with great value.Meanwhile the relationship between personal information and data economy is becoming more complex.In terms of adjusting the relationship between personal information and data,traditional regulations could adopt three types of protection methods,i.e.,the protection of personality right,the personal information authorization use contract,or the administration model.However,these methods cannot actually meet the requirement of reasonably adjusting such relationship,no matter by combined or by single application.The current legal construction regarding the relationship between personal information and data,under circumstances of data economy,should consider the structural essence of data economy,especially its dual-direction dynamic character.Thereby a more complicated rights allocation should be applied.The trend of data economy and data capitalization has facilitated the development of data propertilization,which lead to the establishment of a new property type.However,the relevant theory still needs to be further developed.From the prospect of legal framework,it is necessary to set up a two-stage right based on the distinction between personal information and data assets.Firstly,at the level of personal information or original data,individuals should be entitled with personality right and property right.Secondly,under circumstances of data capitalization,data operators should be entitled to exercise their operating right and property (asset) right,based on the requirement of data operation and profit-driven mechanism.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    龙卫球:龙卫球,法学博士,北京航空航天大学法学院院长、教授、博士生导师,北京科技创新中心研究基地主任。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告