根据科学界与公众对环境风险的争议程度,可将环境风险感知分为“非争议性环境风险感知”和“争议性环境风险感知”两大类。基于CGSS2010数据,本文讨论了媒介使用(媒介使用频次和时事新闻接触)及社会网络(人际信任、人际讨论、人际网络、组织归属)对其的影响。配对样本T检验的结果显示,公众对非争议性环境风险的感知程度显著高于对争议性环境风险的感知程度,但后者的内部差异性显著高于前者。OLS回归模型及广义序次Logistic回归模型显示,传统媒体仍然是影响受众环境风险感知的主要媒介,互联网的影响并不显著。非争议性环境风险感知同时受到媒介使用与社会网络的影响,争议性环境风险感知则更多受到个体属性及媒介使用的影响。
<<According to the degree of controversy on environmental risk between scientific community and the lay,environment risk perception can be divided into two major categories,one is non-controversial environment risk perception and the other is controversial environment risk perception.Based on CGSS 2010 data,we discussed the effect of media use(media usage frequency and current news contact) and social network(interpersonal trust,interpersonal discussion,interpersonal network,belongingness).The results of Paired-Sample T Test showed that the public perception of the non controversial environment risk was significantly higher than the controversial environment risks,while the latter's internal differences were significantly higher than the former.OLS regression model and the generalized ordinal logistic regression model show that the use of traditional media is still a main factor of environment risk perception,while the impact of internet is not significant.Non-controversial environment risk perception is influenced by media use and social network,while the controversial environment risk perception is influenced by the individual attributes and media use.
<<