在对传统资助方式反思的基础上,一些美国基金会实务工作者和学者近年来开展了大量创新。这些创新试图使基金会的资助更加有效,进而创造更大的社会价值。在中国,如何资助非营利组织也是极具潜力的议题。通过比较香港乐施会雅安灾后重建项目,中国扶贫基金会的ME计划,南都基金会和北京银杏公益基金会的景行计划、银杏计划等资助方式,发现上述资助方式各有优点,但在资助理念、伙伴遴选、逻辑框架以及监测评估等方面仍有较大的提升空间。价值驱动的“项目—组织—人”三位一体的资助思路,即不论资助项目、组织还是人,最终其实为一体,一体的灵魂是服务目标人群的价值和使命,能在很大程度上克服上述局限。
<<Based on reflection of the traditional financing ways of foundations,some practitioners and scholars developed continuous creativity and innovation in this area recently. The goal of innovations is to finance effectively and create more social values. Through comparing Ya’an Program of Oxfam Hongkong,ME Program of China Foundation for Poverty Alleviation,Jinghang Program of Narada Foundation,Ginkgo Fellows Program of Beijing Ginkgo Foundation,the authors consider there are very large rooms for improvement in the fields of financing ideas,selecting partners,logical frameworks and evaluation. The Value-driven Trinity of Program-Organization-Manpower Resource can overcome those barriers to a great extent.
<<Keywords: | FoundationNGOsFinancing WaysValue-drivenThe Trinity of Program-Organization-Manpower Resource |