2016年3月16日,四川阆中市人民法院以公判大会形式,对8名违法讨薪农民工判处妨害公务罪,引发舆论高度关注。从舆论倾向性看,公判大会广受诟病。媒体发问,农民工合法维权的渠道是否畅通?网民质疑,公判举动是震慑讨薪还是保护欠薪?法律界人士也纷纷发声,批评公判大会是司法的倒退,呼吁司法工作者忠实践行法治,捍卫公平正义。
<<On March 16,2016,the Intermediate People’s Court of Langzhong City,Sichuan province organized an open trial rally and sentenced 8 migrant workers for illegally demanding their overdue salary in the name of interference with public function,which aroused much attention of the public. The open trial rally was widely criticized for its inclination. Questions were raised by the press on the accessibility of justice for protection of migrant worker’s legitimate right. Netizens argued what was the objective of the trial:to deter migrant workers from demanding their overdue salary or to protect salary arrears. The legal sector also gave their voices,condemning the open trial as a retrogression in the judicial system,and calling the judicial sector to practice the rule of law and safeguard justice.
<<Keywords: | Rural Migrant WorkersPublic OpinionsLangzhong CityDemanding SalaryOpen Trial and Judgement |