您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    Establishing the Exclusionary Rule in China and Macau

    摘要

    改变是困难的。然而,惯性产生惯性。在中国,改变排除规则的时机已经成熟。排除规则是一个时机已经成熟的想法。本文的核心是希望建立适合中国的排除规则。对非法获取证据的司法回应应基于维护法治的需要。通过非法方法获得的证据被排除在外,不是因为它们没有分量,而是因为警察的行为是非法的。接纳证据将使司法机构名誉扫地。然而,中国法官经常宽恕警方违反程序,只要证据表明被告有罪,这将触发排除规则。 <<
    >>

    Abstract

    Change is hard.However,inertia begets inertia.In China,the time is ripe for a change in the context of exclusionary rule.The exclusionary rule is an idea whose time has come.Lying at the heart of this thesis is a wish to establish the suitable exclusionary rule for China.The judicial response to the illegally obtained evidence should be based on the need to uphold the rule of law.The evidence obtained by illegal methods was excluded,not because they have no weight,but because the police have behaved illegally.The admission of the evidence would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.Chinese judges,however,often condone procedural violations by the police which would trigger the exclusionary rule as long as evidence indicates the defendant’s guilt. <<
    >>
    作者简介
    Hsieh Kuo-hsing(谢国欣):Lecturer in Law,Macau University of Science and Technology;Doctoral Research Student in Law,University of Edinburgh.
    <<
    >>
    相关报告