对于如何推动社会工作在农村反贫困中的应用,主流的学术研究可概括为“问题-缺乏”、“优势-资产”以及“方法-工作者”三种较为清晰的范式。三种范式各有侧重,都试图从各自的角度出发,探索农村贫困问题的根源及其解决之道。不过,从反贫困的实践效果和学术交锋的激烈程度来看,三种主流范式相对分割的现状所造成的实践与理论困境也十分突出,呈现困扰学术界和实践领域的“范式危机”。如何化解这种范式危机,是社会工作介入农村反贫困领域必然要面对和必须要深入探讨的议题。本研究从范式融合的理念出发,秉持解决问题的基本导向,以“优势-资产”范式为核心变量,融合三种范式的优势意识、问题意识以及方法意识,提出基于“优势-资产”范式的“多元融合方法”,以期拓展农村社会工作的研究范式。
<<To promote the application of social work in the rural poverty reduction,the mainstream academic research can be summarized as three paradigms of “problem-deficiency”,“strength-asset” and “method-worker”. The three paradigms have their own emphases,aiming to explore the root of the rural poverty problem and its solution from their respective perspectives. However,from the practical effect of anti-poverty and the intensity of academic confrontation,the practical and theoretical dilemma caused by the division of the three mainstream paradigms are very prominent,indicating a “paradigm crisis” that plagued the academic circles and practical fields. How to resolve this paradigm crisis is a challenge that social work must face. Based on the concept of “paradigms integration” and upholding the basic orientation of problem-solving,this paper takes the “strength-asset” paradigm as the core variable and integrates the three types of strength consciousness,problem consciousness and method consciousness. Following this approach,this paper proposes a “multi-integration approach” based on the “strength-asset” paradigm,with a view of expanding the research pararena of rural social work.
<<Keywords: | Rural Social Work“Strength-asset” Paradigm“Problem-deficiency” Paradigm“Met-hod-worker” ParadigmParadigm Integration |