2016年,中国司法改革继续出台改革措施贯彻落实十八届四中全会提出的改革要求,回应司法现实需求。在司法机构和司法人财物管理上,增设巡回法庭,改革法院检察院内设机构,完善法官检察官的选任、惩戒制度等;先前开展的司法改革试点积累了经验,为改革措施的微调奠定了基础。在司法权力运行机制方面,强调三大诉讼繁简分流、简案速决,深化多元化纠纷解决机制改革,推进以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革,将速裁程序纳入认罪认罚从宽制度试点,推进检察机关民事、行政公益诉讼,加强检察监督,完善民事、刑事执行,推进陪审制试点,完善法庭规则、维护司法权威等。在保护诉权和诉讼权利方面,规范羁押必要性审查、推进国家赔偿,加强对弱势群体的司法保护,规范司法救助,保护职务犯罪举报人,推进行政机关负责人应诉等。
<<In 2016,China continued to adopt new reform measures to implement the reform plans put forward by the CPC at the Fourth Plenary Session of its Eighteenth Central Committee and to respond to new demands of judicial practice. With respect to the management of judicial organs,personnel,finance and property,China has set up circuit courts,reformed internal organs of courts and procuratorates,and improved the systems of selection,appointment,reward and punishment of judges and procurators;and the experiences gained in earlier pilot programs of judicial reform have laid the foundation for the fine adjustment of reform measures. With respect to the operation mechanism of judicial power,China has stressed the separation of complex cases from simple ones in criminal,civil and administrative proceedings so that simple cases can be dealt with by summary procedure,deepened the reform of pluralistic dispute resolution mechanisms,advanced the trial-centered criminal procedure reform,brought summary procedure into the scope of pilot programs on the system of leniency to those who plead guilty and accept punishment,promoted the institution of public interest civil and administrative litigations by procuratorial organs,strengthened procuratorial supervision,improved the execution of civil and criminal judgments,carried out pilot work on the assessor system,improved court rules and upheld judicial authority. With respect to the protection of the right of action and litigious rights,China has standardized the procedure for the review of the necessity of custody,advanced the reform of state compensation system,strengthened the judicial protection of vulnerable groups,standardized judicial aid,taken measures to protect whistleblowers in cases of duty-related crimes,and implemented the system whereby the person in charge of an administrative organ appears in court to respond to litigation against the administrative organ.
<<Keywords: | Judicial ReformOperation of Judicial PowerSafeguarding Litigious RightSeparation of Complex Cases From Simple Ones |