本文以10个典型意见领袖账号为案例,抽取其中的1154条微博作为研究样本,在内容分析的基础上从信息生产角度探讨了意见领袖的社会责任问题。研究发现,意见领袖在微博信息生产中的社会责任状况并不乐观。在信息基本属性方面,微博意见领袖所生产的信息质量不高,本研究所观察到的原创度、深度、时效性、信度、信源五个指标百分比数较低。在文本话语框架方面,微博意见领袖偏情感表达而轻理性分析,意见领袖为了达到更佳的舆论影响效果,偏重情绪动员,这对非理性舆情的蔓延起到推波助澜的作用。在协商讨论质量方面,意见领袖对于公共事件、公共问题和公共需求方面的关注度不高,大量的讨论是以意见领袖个人的问题取向为中心,带有比较明显的自上而下的议题设置的倾向,这种情况使得微博的公共协商功能被削弱。
<<Based on content analysis,this study drew 1154 micro-blog items from 10 typical opinion leaders as research samples and explored the social responsibility issues of these opinion leaders from an information production perspective. The research shows that a low level of social responsibility ratings among opinion leaders in their information production processes. In the aspect of information basic attributes,the information quality produced by micro-blog opinion leaders is not high,with particular low indicators in originality,degree,depth,timeliness,reliability,sources. In the aspect of text framework,micro-blog opinion leaders are inclined to emotional expressions rather than rational analysis. This reliance on emotional mobilizations aggravated the spread of irrational public opinions. In the consultation and discussion quality aspect,opinion leaders in general demonstrated a lack of interest towards public events,issues and demands. Massive amount of opinion leaders’ discussions were of self-interest basis,and showed an obvious top-down agenda setting tendency,which weakened the designed public consultation function of micro-blog.
<<