克莱夫·贝尔提出了美学假说“艺术是‘有意味的形式’”,他认为艺术的基本性质是“有意味的形式”,其美学理论将形式从艺术作品中抽象出来并加以强调,为以塞尚为代表的后印象派、以毕加索为代表的立体主义提供了方法论基础和理论依据。虽然整个理论论证过程存在循环论证的问题,但是其认为艺术不是对现实生活的模仿和再现,应该超越生活情感追求终极审美情感的理论核心,却为现代艺术创作带来了巨大的革新力量。贝尔的“形式与意味”理论对中国传统书法也有着很大的理论适用性,使得贝尔的美学观点不仅在艺术理论承接与转向上富有创造性意义,而且在与艺术创作实际的结合过程中显示出一些超越时空、东西方的普遍性价值,这对当今艺术理论的发展和艺术创造依然具有巨大价值。
<<Clive Bell creatively raised an aesthetic hypothesis that art was a “significant form”,which he thought to be the basic quality of art. Bell’s aesthetic theory abstracted “form” from art works and put great emphasis on this conception. This theory laid the foundation for the Post-impressionism featuring Cezanne’s works and Cubism featuring Picasso’s works. Although there exists Cartesian circle in the process of proving this theory,it brings about huge innovative force to modern art as it holds that art is not the imitation or representation of the reality and that ultimate aesthetic emotions which transcends emotions of daily life are what art should pursue. Bell’s theory of “form and significance” also applies greatly to Chinese traditional calligraphy,which suggests that the theory not only has creative significance in art,but also bears universal value traversing time and space when combined with art practice. In this sense,Bell’s aesthetic theory has great value for the development of modern art theory and practice.
<<