您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    论将“保证业务”列入保险公司业务范围的合理性基础

    摘要

    保证保险法律性质长期争论不止、辩而不明,原因在于我国《保险法》未将保证业务列为我国保险公司的业务范围,而市场对此类业务又有巨大需求,于是我国保险公司“创新性”地推出相关保证保险产品以满足市场对保证业务日益增长的需求。实际上,明确将保证业务列为我国保险公司的业务范围,不仅不存在理论与立法上的障碍,而且是我国保险行业简捷、合理、高效地满足市场需要的有效途径,是立法科学构建我国保险公司业务范围的必然选择,也可根本解决我国保证保险法律性质争议、化解相关纠纷。我国保险业有能力控制好经营保证业务可能引发的风险。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    The legal nature of surety bond has long been a subject of endless argument while has not yet been developed a clear conclusion,the reason is that the Chinese insurance law has not classified the ‘guarantee business’ into the scope of business which Chinese insurance companies are permitted to carry out,whereas the market has huge demand of this kind of business,consequently the Chinese insurance companies creatively introduce a series of “surety bond” products to meet the rapidly rising demand of the market for guarantee business. In fact,it will not trigger any theoretical obstacles with the existing Chinese insurance law to expressly permit insurance companies to carry out guarantee business as the insurance companies’ scope of business,instead it is the effective approach for China insurance industry to meet the market demand in a straightforward,reasonable and productive way,moreover from the legislature perspective it is the inevitable choice to scientifically constitute the Chinese insurance companies’ business scope,thus fundamentally resolve the controversial understanding of the legal nature of surety bond and settle the relevant dispute. China insurance industry is capable of well managing the risks that arise from conducting guarantee business.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    喻华峰:喻华峰,中国社会科学院研究生院博士研究生。
    曹顺明:曹顺明,法学博士,中国行为法学会常务理事,中国社会科学院金融法律与金融监管研究基地特邀研究员。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告