本文对机会平等和实质平等的区分进行了讨论。机会平等要求一个人的命运不应由出生时的意外或者其他超出自身控制范围的因素所决定,而这一点也恰恰要求社会对结果进行调整。另外,精英主义机会平等只有在非常特定的条件下才能成立,即人们只有在获得成功的机会不被特定的人把持时才被认为有平等的机会。这种平等在充分的民主政治下通过调整市场分配结果也同样能够实现,而后者却被定义为结果平等。即,主张机会平等的理由和主张结果平等的理由实际上建立在相同的基础上,在表达和修辞上对“两种平等”进行区分并没有提供更好的理解,反而引发了更多误解。
<<This article addresses the distinction between equality of opportunity and equality of result. Equality of opportunity requires that a person’s fortunes not be determined by accidents of birth or other factors over which he or she has no control,which also requires distribution of result. In addition,the meritocratic conception of equality of opportunity is a conception of equality only in a very specialized way. People have equal opportunities only in the sense that their chances for success are not dictated by identifiable others. The same kind of equality inheres in well-functioning democratic political arrangements that bring about equality of result by altering market outcomes. Arguments for equality of opportunity and equality of result rest on the same foundations,and the rhetoric that contrasts them is more misleading than valuable.
<<Keywords: | Equality of OpportunityEquality of ResultMeritocratic Conception of Equality of Opportunity |