面对街道办过度行政化以及有效治理难以推行的困境,中国基层改革形成了两种主导模式:一是强化街道办的“赋权”模式,一是弱化街道办的“削权”模式,前者以深圳为代表,后者以安徽铜陵为代表。虽然两地改革的具体方式不同,但都以减少行政层级和社会管理扁平化为目标。与以上两种改革不同,沈阳在撤销街道办后单独设置了具有行政审批权的经济社会管理功能区作为新型派出机构。这种变通重组的改革,既是避免权力寻租、规避施政风险的有效策略,也是将土地征收等经济目标分解到基层的重要手段。采取何种改革策略不仅关乎治理的合法性,还关乎治理的有效性。不同的改革模式,不仅与地区经济发展不均衡有关,还受传统体制渗透强弱的影响。
<<During the new historical period,the urban local governments adopted two different kinds of reform strategies to cope with the excessive administration trouble and the effective governance challenges:one is the empowerment mode to strengthen the street agencies,and the other is the disempowerment mode to cut the street agencies. The former reform is represented by Shenzhen city,and the latter is represented by Tongling city in Anhui province. Although the reform measures adopted in Shenzhen are completely different from the one which were adopted in Tongling,but both goals of the two modes are reducing the administrative level. But the street agency reform in Shenyang was different from the above two cities. Three reform measures were adopted in Shenyang,including cutting the street agencies,integrating the communities and establishing comprehensive management functional organizations. Different reform models were not only related to the regional economic development imbalance,but also are influenced by the redistribution system penetration strength.
<<