您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    《行政诉讼法》修改及实施展望

    摘要

    新修订的《行政诉讼法》与配套司法解释在2015年5月1日正式施行,新修订的《行政诉讼法》在受案范围、管辖权制度、规范性文件审查、判决类型等方面作出了具体且重要的变革,同时增设了复议机关作共同被告以及被诉行政机关负责人出庭应诉等诸多新制度,这将对行政诉讼未来的发展带来深远影响。本文首先论述了《行政诉讼法》及其司法解释之修改,指出可以看出从地方司法政策试验到中央立法吸纳的过程;其次论述了《行政诉讼法》中的政策创新条款,主要包括行政诉讼受案范围的进一步扩大、跨行政区域管辖制度的政策创新、行政机关负责人出庭应诉义务的法定化、简易程序与调解条款的修订、引入规范性文件附带审查与司法建议条款以及其他政策创新机制;然后对新修订的《行政诉讼法》提出未来展望,指出行政诉讼要充分发挥制度功能,需要在多重制度目的中作出合理取舍,提供更多的政策创新机制,以体现自身竞争优势。 <<
    >>

    Abstract

    The newly revised "administrative procedure law" and relevant judicial interpretation on May 1, 2015 officially implemented, the new revision of the "administrative litigation law" in terms of subject scope, jurisdiction system, normative documents review, the type of judgments made specific and important changes, while the addition of the reconsideration as co defendants and the sued administrative organ responsible person to appear respondent and so on many new system, which will for the future development of administrative litigation brought far-reaching influence. This paper first discusses the amendment of "administrative procedure law" and the judicial interpretation, that can be seen from the local judicial policy to absorb the test process of the central legislation; secondly discusses the "administrative litigation law" in terms of policy innovation in, including the scope of administrative litigation, and further expand the cross regional jurisdiction system policy innovation, the administrative organ respondent court legal obligations, the summary procedure and the mediation clause revision and introduction of normative documents and judicial review with the proposed terms and other policy innovation mechanism; then the new revision of the "administrative litigation law" put forward the future, points out that administrative litigation should give full play to the system function, need to make reasonable multiple choice in system, policy innovation mechanism more, to reflect their own competitive advantage. <<
    >>
    作者简介
    卢超:卢超,中国社会科学院法学研究所助理研究员。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告