社会发展的规律性和预见性及社会历史科学合法性问题是学界迄今颇具争议的问题之一。波普尔就曾在其著作中从否定社会发展规律性和预见性的角度对马克思唯物史观进行过严厉批判。对于这一批判,学界从方法论、历史观和政治立场等方面已进行了批驳,但需要从学理上进一步深入剖析和系统分析。立足于社会发展的实际历史进程,从社会发展规律、社会发展趋势和社会预测三个方面重新梳理和解读波普尔对马克思唯物史观的批判,客观分析和科学评价这一批判的合理之处和不足,进而从学理上进一步澄清波普尔对于马克思唯物史观的歪曲和误解,有助于还原马克思唯物史观本意,深化人们对于社会发展规律性和预见性的认识。
<<It has been one controversial issue on the regularity and predictability of social development and the resulting validity of historical social science in academic circles. Popper criticized severely Marx’s historical materialism on the regularity and the predictability of social development in his writings. Scholars has refuted this criticism in methodology,history and politics,but it need to be analyzed from the theory deeply. Based on the actual historical process of the social development,it helps to clarify Marx’s historical materialism which has been distorted and misinterpreted by Popper and restore its truth,and deepen the understanding of the regularity and the predictability of the social development that we comb and interpret Popper’s critique on Marx’s historical materialism again from the law,the trend and the forecasting of social development,and analyses objectively and evaluate scientifically.
<<Keywords: | Social PredictionSocial LawSocial Trend |