伴随着新型城镇化导向的城市区域发展迈向新的进阶,地方政府正在追求进一步深化改革,以考核评价和不断提升政府效能和绩效。在此过程中,考评结果影响着被考评对象的公共形象与资源分配,也给考评的设计带来了利益关联;通常情况下,政府部门的职权强弱能够对于指标设计产生相应的导向性影响,以在考评中体现出自身职能工作的重要性。从2008年的科学发展观、建设现代产业体系和建设宜居城市“首善之区”,到2012年“着力加快转型升级,建设幸福广州”,再到2013年全面推进新型城市化发展,广州的城市区域发展也呈现出渐进的优化与变革。相应的,作为承载城市区域发展战略重要评鉴维度的指标的遴选与运用也充分体现出其特定的价值导向以及政府间关系架构的重塑。
<<This paper aims at pursuing a case study of Guangzhou New Urbanization Development Evaluation,with focuses on the indicators selection & adoption and the government sectors’ functional capacities thus manifested. The paper firstly revisits the different draft versions of the evaluation indicator system and tries to categorize the indicators clusters and related sectors in charge so as to define the certain correlation between sectoral functional capacity and it’s influence upon the indicator selection & adoption. The former variant will be measured by the frequency statistics of sectoral appearance in city-level normative documents thus their importance in the government system will be affirmed;and the latter variant by the change of indicator numbers adopted and their weights allocated;on those basis,the synthetic calculation for the correlation scale will be attained by making full use of data sets and its application,for the purpose of describing the actual capacity of government sector and their contribution to evaluation design,namely their influences exerted upon evaluation organization & design. The preliminary conclusion shows that the influence of government sector on the evaluation indicator system design does derived from the comparative authority of the certain sectors,including their legal responsibilities,statues in the government system and the behavior styles. The greater functional capacity it possesses,the higher influences upon the evaluation design would be exerted.
<<Keywords: | EvaluationIndicatorUrban Region DevelopmentFunctional CapacityInfluence of Government Sector on the Evaluation Indicator System Design |