更多>>
课题组动态
更多>>
皮书作者
热点推荐：
双循环
在比较刑法学中，“犯罪论体系”是关于犯罪成立和形态（或形式）的知识体系，包括“犯罪构成论体系”和“犯罪形态论体系”两个子系，前者具有独立性和自足性，两个子系具有判断对象（行为人）的同一性。在国际刑法学中，“国际犯罪论体系”依然是关于国际犯罪成立与形态（或形式）的知识体系，包括“国际犯罪构成论体系”和“国际犯罪形态论体系”两个子系，前者解决“小鱼”的犯罪认定，后者解决“大鱼”的刑事归责。由于两个子系具有判断对象（行为人）的相异性，若想完成国际犯罪（“大鱼”归责）的充足性判断，两个子系缺一不可。因此，“国际犯罪论体系”与“犯罪构成论体系”具有同一性，后者同样包含“国际犯罪形态论体系”。可见，比较刑法学中的“犯罪论体系”之争可以提供国际体系思考的知识论基础，但不能也不应直接进行国际转化。照搬法系或国内体系直接套解国际体系，无法使两种研讨实现互动与双赢。
<<In comparative criminal law，theoretical system of crimes refers to a systemic knowledge about establishment and forms of crimes，in which two systems at second level，namely，constitutional system of crimes and theoretical system of forms of crimes standing hand by hand—the former being independent and complete，at the same time both of them being with a same judging object of crime.Generally speaking，in international criminal law，the case is the same while the difference is that two systems are not only co-dependent on each other but also must go in order for both the valuing objects and the goals of them are not the same even though with a same，final destination—to bring big fishes to justice.In this means，case-by-case method is extremely important.
<<| Keywords： | International Theoretical System of CrimesInternational Constitutional System of CrimesInternational Theoretical System of Forms of Crimes |
