群体性抗争事件的现有研究主要从资源动员、政治结构与机会、策略框架等角度研究抗争的过程、结果及影响。对于政府相关政策文件在处理群体性抗争事件过程中的主导作用却鲜有研究,本文以相关政策文本为基础,分析政府处理群体性抗争事件政策的基本特征,解释其政策设计的基本逻辑,并结合乌坎事件对其进行验证性分析。研究发现:政策目标、目标人群建构、规则框架、政策工具设计、执行机构等政策要素的设计过程中,都存在明显的有效性内在假设。一旦部分假设条件不成立,就易出现“政策失灵”现象,乌坎事件平息前的处理过程恰好验证了这样的分析框架。最后,提出政策设计应该区分不同事件中抗争主体的方案完整度、组织化程度、冲突程度、信息可达程度、抗争对象的态度反应等因素,实行基于过程的动态管理。同时,在差异化的具体情境中,重视社会建构的政策设计要素,适当采用开放互动式的政策设计模式,吸纳抗争主体参与政策设计,满足公民的知情权以及决策参与权。
<<Existing studies on mass protests primarily examine the process,consequences and implications of protests from such angles as resource mobilization,political structure and opportunity,as well as policy frameworks,with little attention paid to the guiding role that related government policy documents have in dealing with a mass protest. This paper analyzes the basic characters of government policies on the basis of related policy texts for dealing with mass protests,and further explains the basic logic behind their creation in the context of the Wukan protests and corresponding confirmatory analysis. The study has found that all policy elements such as policy purpose,target groups,framework of rules,policy instruments,and executive bodies have remarkable underlying assumptions about effectiveness. As soon as some of these assumed conditions fail to occur,policy failure is likely,as illustrated by the government response to the Wukan incident. Finally,the paper recommends that policy design discriminate such factors as protester scheme completeness and level of organization,conflict and information accessibility,as well as attitudes and reactions of objects of protest,and process-based dynamic management of stressors. Meanwhile,in face of varying circumstances,it is recommended that the policy design attach importance to policy design elements in relation to social construction,and adopt as appropriate an open,interactive policy design model which involves protesters in policy design and gives the public the right to know and to participate in decision-making.
<<