您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    关于澳大利亚养老状况的调研及启示

    摘要

    20世纪80年代中期以前,澳大利亚实行福利型的养老保障制度,多数人不能享受。随着老年人口迅速增长,这种覆盖面窄、现收现付、筹资渠道单一的养老保障机制缺陷凸显,政府负担日益加重而难以为继。于是,从20世纪80年代后期澳大利亚开始进行养老金制度改革,逐步改成基本养老金(即社会福利救济金)、超年金(即退休金)和个人储蓄养老金相结合的“三支柱”式养老金制度体系,成为世界上运作最成功的典范之一,既解决了政府和广大国民的后顾之忧,也促进了国家经济的发展。借鉴国外养老服务事业发展方面的经验,北京民力健康传播中心、北京健康城市建设促进会联合课题组成员专程赴澳大利亚进行了调研和考察,并对澳大利亚的养老状况、主要做法和取得的成效进行了梳理和总结。其经验主要包括四个方面:一是制定法律法规,建立健全养老金保障体系;二是创新养老办法,形成多种养老模式;三是规范行业标准,提供各种养老服务支持;四是注重队伍建设,培养素质过硬的养老从业人员。澳大利亚在养老服务工作中的经验、做法,为北京市乃至中国发展养老服务事业提供了值得借鉴的经验。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    In the years before the mid-1980s,Australia has adopted a welfare-oriented pension system which excluded most people. With the rapid growth of the elderly population,there has been the unfolding of the defects of this system such as narrow coverage,PAYG,limited financing channels and it has then become an unsustainable burden on the part of the government. The pension system reform was launched in the late 1980s and gradually evolved into a pension system that combined “the three pillars”:basic pension(i.e.,social welfare payments),super annuity(i.e.,pension)and personal savings. It has become one of the most successful system in the world,which has both addressed the government and its people’s worries about the future and the economy development. To learn from the experience of pension services development of foreign countries,Beijing Mingli Health Communication,Beijing Healthy City Construction Promotion Joint Task Force visited Australia for studying and training and made a summary of their pension condition,major methods,and achievements. The experience can be summed up in the following four aspects:firstly,the formation of laws and rules to improve a pension guarantee system;secondly,the innovation of old-age care ways to develop varied modes;thirdly,the regulation of industry standards to provided varied old-age care support;fourthly,the prominence to team building to cultivate qualified personnel. Australian experience in and method of old-age service will shed light on the development of old-age service in Beijing and even in China.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    北京民力健康传播中心、北京健康城市建设促进会联合课题组:课题组负责人:王彦峰,中国医药卫生事业发展基金会理事长,教授;王鸿春,北京健康城市建设促进会理事长、北京健康城市建设研究中心主任兼首席专家,研究员、高级经济师。执笔人:徐威,《北京工作》编辑,政工师,主要研究方向为决策应用研究;陈谊,北京市老龄办副主任,多年从事老龄工作,主要研究方向为老龄政策研究;张青阳,博士,北京民力健康传播中心副理事长。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告