本文以食品药品监督检查信息公开为主线,剖析了我国食品药品监督检查信息公开的现状,同时聚焦美国、欧盟、英国、德国、日本及我国香港地区的相关法规与经验,采用比较研究等方法,对食品药品监督检查信息公开中如何处理好主动公开和依申请公开、过程公开和结果公开、限制公开和不予公开等的关系,公开的具体项目、程序,以及如何在信息公开所保护的国家利益、公共利益和信息不公开所保护的个体利益之间寻求一种平衡做一研究。在考察了国内外食品药品监督检查信息公开状况之后,从中提炼出了一些制度方面或具体做法上的经验和启示。
<<In the article we focus upon the food and drug supervision and inspection information disclosure and have an analysis of the status quo of such information disclosure in our country. On the other hand,the relevant legislations and experience from the United States,European Union,the United Kingdom,Germany,Japan and Hong Kong SAR are studied as well by adopting a comparative approach. Such comparative study covers the topics of the relations between initiative disclosure and disclosure upon request,process disclosure and result disclosure,limited disclosure and non-disclosure as well as the items subject to disclosure and its procedure,and how to balance the State interest and public interest which are protected by information disclosure against the individual interest which is on the contrary protected by non-disclosure. Based upon such studies of food and drug supervision and inspection information disclosure from both home and abroad,we summarize some good experience and practices in the system construction and daily routines.
<<