您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    核能风险如何被放大?

    摘要

    当下中国社会已经处于风险状态中,近年来,以江门民众反对鹤山核燃料项目为代表的“低风险、高愤怒”议题越来越呈现频发态势。本文以“风险的社会放大”框架为出发点,以山东民众反对荣成石岛湾核电站和乳山红石顶核电站事件为案例,探讨在中国语境下,何种机制会导致环境风险的社会放大。我们发现,风险主要经由信息传播和社会响应这两个阶段得到放大。在信息传播阶段,媒体、专家和意见领袖的风险信息建构引发的信息流属性的改变会对风险信息的放大产生一定的影响。而在风险信息的社会响应阶段,是否存在污名化,以及民众对信息传播者是否信任,都决定了这一阶段风险是否被放大。本研究是一种将西方风险放大理论与中国当下语境相结合的理论尝试。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    Contemporary China has stepped into a risk society.In recent years,environmental issues such as the nuclear fuel project in Heshan,Guangdong Province has triggered a series of collective actions.Yet some of these issues can be characterized as “low-hazard,high outrage”.Taking the theoretical framework of “social amplification of risk”,this paper explores the mechanisms in the process of social amplification of environmental risks in China.Based on the case studies of Shandong people’s opposing Shidaowan Nuclear Power Plant and Rushan Nuclear Power Plant,we have come to a conclusion that environmental risks are amplified during the process of information communication and society response.In the process of information communication,the public debate and the way in which information is constructed by the media,experts and opinion leaders will determine whether risk information is amplified.In the process of social response,whether people attach a stigmating label to a certain issue and whether people interpret information in a confrontational way will also affect the amplification of risk.This study is a theoretical attempt to introduce western theory of “social amplification of risk” into the context of contemporary Chinese society.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    曾繁旭:曾繁旭,清华大学新闻与传播学院副教授
    戴佳:戴佳,清华大学新闻与传播学院讲师
    王宇琦:王宇琦,清华大学新闻与传播学院硕士研究生。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告