您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    中国设立知识产权法院的路径选择

    摘要

    近几年来,中国知识产权案件数量急剧增加,但知识产权案件审判工作缺乏应有的专业性,案件管辖较为混乱,为此,各地法院积极探索知识产权民事、行政、刑事案件“三审合一”的审判模式改革。《中共中央关于全面深化改革若干重大问题的决定》正式将“探索建立知识产权法院”纳入深化改革的重要议程。知识产权法院的设立,对于提升知识产权案件审判的专业性和审判效率都具有十分重要的意义。本文认为,在改革的过程中,可以充分借鉴国外“知识产权专门法院”“知识产权上诉法院”“商业法院”等成熟模式。但在路径选择中,还需要结合中国的知识产权保护水平、司法审判体制以及中国当前的法律体系等具体情况。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    In the recent years,the cases for intellectual property rights(IPR)disputes have significantly increased in China. However,due to the lack of professional expertise in the trials of IPR cases,the jurisdiction of such cases had been chaotic at times. Chinese courts have been actively exploring the trial model reforms,combining the civil,administrative,and criminal IPR cases in a“Three-Trials-in-One”model. The CPC Central Committee’s Decision on Major Issues Concerning Comprehensively Deepening Reforms has formally put“exploring the establishment of intellectual property courts”as part of the important agenda for deepening reforms. The establishment of intellectual property courts has substantial significance for the enhancement of the professionalism and efficiency in the trials of IPR cases. In the process of the reforms,the well-established models abroad for“specialized intellectual property courts”,“intellectual property courts of appeal”,and“trade practices tribunals”should be fully considered. However,in choosing the proper paths,practical circumstances such as the status of the protection of IPRs in China,the mechanisms of court trials,and China’s current legal regime,must also be taken into consideration.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    杨延超:中国社会科学院法学研究所副研究员。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告