您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    中国法院诉讼费用退费机制的规范化建构——以全国77家法院诉讼费用退费机...

    摘要

    随着中国司法体制配套改革的深入,法院财政整体得到有效保障,退还当事人诉讼费已成为法院的一项常态化工作。然而,通过分析全国77家样本法院发现,目前中国法院规定的诉讼费用退费机制在退费文件的制定、退费范围、退费启动程序、退费办理流程、备用金制度、诉费追缴机制等方面均存在规范性欠缺的问题,这不仅损害了当事人的权益,影响公众对法院的信任,同时也给法院内部带来了廉政风险,亟须构建规范化诉讼费退费机制。对退费机制进行规范化建构本质上是一种管理措施,因此,可以从建立科学统一的退费机制,实现退费机制规范化运行,强化对退费机制运行的监管以及及时填补风险漏洞等方面,探索诉讼费用退费机制的规范化路径。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    With the deepening of the supporting reform of China’s judicial system,the overall financial security of the court has been effectively guaranteed,and the refund of the litigation cost has become a normal work of the court. However,through the analysis of 77 sample courts in China,it is found that the current litigation cost refund mechanism stipulated by China’s courts still has normative deficiencies in many aspects,such as the formulation of the refund documents,the scope of refund,the start-up procedure of refund,the process of refund handling,the reserve system and the mechanism of litigation fee recovery. This not only damages the rights and interests of the litigants and affects the public’s trust in the court,but also brings the honest government risk to the court. Therefore,it is urgent to construct a standardized litigation cost refund mechanism. The standardized construction of the refund mechanism is a management measure in nature,so the standardized path of the litigation cost refund mechanism can be explored from the aspects of establishing a scientific and unified refund mechanism,realizing the standardized operation of the refund system and strengthening the supervision of the operation of the refund mechanism and timely filling the risky loopholes.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    孙琳:孙琳,中国社会科学院大学博士研究生,北京市房山区人民法院法官助理。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告