您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    中国皮书内容评价分析报告(2022)

    摘要

    截至2022年3月,共有425部2021年版皮书参与了皮书评价。从内容分类上看,地方发展类皮书最多,达到150部;文化传媒类皮书数量最少,占比不到10%。从研创机构上看,中国社会科学院、高校及高校智库、地方社会科学院、党政部门及其智库研创的皮书超过了总品种的80%,质量相对较高。与往年相比,2021年版皮书的评价在同行评审的基础上,主观指标和综合评价首次使用评价评级方式代替具体的打分方式。在参与评价的皮书中,55部皮书较好,等级为A+和A;308部皮书等级为B+和B;62部皮书相对较差,等级为C+和C。其中,经济类皮书在B+及以上等级的皮书数量占所在类别皮书总数的66。2%,占比最大;地方发展类皮书在B+及以上等级的皮书数量占所在类别皮书总数的47。3%,占比最小。本报告对各类别皮书主观指标进行分析,发现前沿性、创新性等指标获得较高评价等级的皮书数量较少;对客观指标进行分析,发现时效性等指标获得较高评价等级的皮书数量较少。这些都需要在撰写报告时注意补充和提高。针对皮书报告中存在的体例规范和框架结构问题,建议研创单位做好出版计划,约稿时强调报告写作要求;针对部分报告存在的学术论文、政府工作报告、技术分析报告倾向,建议研创单位突出皮书报告的智库特色;针对部分皮书主题碎片化、主题相似或者交叉的情况,出版社需要进一步加强管理。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    By the end of March 2022,a total of 425 2021 pishu had participated in the pishu evaluation. In terms of content classification,there are 150 kinds of local development pishu. The number of cultural and media pishu is the least,accounting for less than 10%. From the perspective of research and innovation institutions,the research and innovation of think tanks of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,universities and colleges,think tanks of local academies of Social Sciences,party and government departments and their think tanks account for more than 80% of the total varieties,and the quality is relatively high. Compared with previous years,the evaluation of the 2021 edition of pishu is based on peer review. The subjective indicators and comprehensive evaluation use the evaluation rating method instead of the specific scoring method for the first time. Among the pishu involved in the evaluation,55 kinds of pishu are better,with the grades of a+and a. The 308 seed coat pishu ranks B+and B;The 62 seed coat pishu is relatively poor,and the grade is C+and C. Among them,the number of economic pishu at B+and above accounts for 66.2% of the total number of pishu in the category,accounting for the largest proportion. The number of local development pishu at B + and above accounts for 47.3% of the total number of local development pishu,accounting for the smallest proportion. Through the analysis of the subjective indicators of various types of pishu,it is found that the number of leading-edge and innovative indicators with higher evaluation levels is the least;Through the analysis of objective indicators,it is found that the number of timeliness indicators with higher evaluation levels is the least,which needs to be supplemented and improved when writing the report. In view of the style specification and frame structure problems in the paper report,it is suggested that the research and development unit make a good publication plan and emphasize the writing requirements of the report when soliciting contributions;In view of the tendency of academic papers,government work reports and technical analysis reports in some reports,highlight the think tank characteristics of the paper report;In view of the fragmentation,similar or overlapping themes of some of the pishu,the management needs to be further strengthened.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    丁阿丽:丁阿丽,社会科学文献出版社皮书研究院副院长,研究方向为皮书出版、智库成果评价。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告