深圳“一户一栋”政策,对保障城市化进程中被征地原村民的合法权益,平衡城市发展与集体、个人土地增值收益分配发挥了重要作用。在该政策施行的过程中,不可避免地出现行政诉讼案件。本报告通过梳理2012~2021年的30宗行政诉讼判决发现,“一户一栋”政策主要存在以下问题:一是“一户”中关于“户”的认定存在理解争议;二是“一户一栋”资格公示程序设置未保障相对人权益;三是信息公开和信访程序空转等其他问题。对此,本报告建议注重政策的连贯性、完善程序设置的合理性、注重争议的实质化解。本报告分析深圳“一户一栋”政策涉诉行政争议类型和影响,可为深圳今后政策的制定和我国其他快速城市化区域可持续发展提供借鉴与参考。
<<“One Household,One Building” policy of Shenzhen has played an important role in protecting the legitimate rights and interests of former villagers whose land was expropriated in the process of urbanization,and balancing urban development with the distribution of collective and individual land appreciation benefits. In the course of the implementation of this policy,administrative litigation cases are inevitable. By combing through the 30 administrative litigation judgments from 2012 to 2021,it is found that the “One Household,One Building” policy mainly has the following problems:firstly,there is a dispute over the understanding of the identification of “Household” in “One Household”;secondly,the “One Household,One Building” qualification publicity procedure has not protected the rights and interests of the counterpart;thirdly,other issues such as information disclosure and the petitioning make the procedure idled. In this regard,it is recommended to pay attention to the coherence of policies,improve the rationality of procedural settings,and pay attention to the substantive resolution of disputes. This report analyzing the types and impacts of administrative disputes involved in litigation under Shenzhen’s “One Household,One Building” policy can provide reference for the formulation of future policies in Shenzhen and the sustainable development of other rapidly urbanizing regions in China.
<<Keywords: | Qualification Identification“One HouseholdOne Building”Original VillagerNon-commercial Residential Construction |