随着我国公共项目投融资体制改革的推进以及新型城镇化进程的加快,PPP模式得到了广泛应用。然而,许多项目在执行过程中出现了容错激励和惩罚约束设计不当、整改条款缺失等问题。如何设计并优化容错激励与惩罚约束的付费机制,并且将整改约束嵌入付费机制,是PPP实践亟待解决的新问题,也是PPP项目提高供给质量和效率、实现物有所值的紧迫需求。基于此,本报告比较分析了线性付费、阶梯付费、容错型付费以及先容后惩型付费的优劣势,以解决项目风险分担不均与项目公司机会主义行为等问题。同时,从整改指标设计、整改时间要求以及整改扣分策略三个方面,分析了目前PPP项目中整改机制设计情况,为整改机制的科学合理设计提供理论指导。
<<With the reform of public project investment and financing system and the acceleration of new urbanization in China,PPP model has been widely used. However,there are some problems in the implementation of the project,such as unreasonable tolerance incentives and punishment constraints,and the lack of rectification clauses. How to design and optimize the payment mechanism considering fault-tolerant incentive and penalty constraints,and how to embed rectification constraints into the payment mechanism become new problems to be solved urgently in PPP practice as well as the urgent needs for PPP projects to improve supply quality and efficiency and achieve value for money. Based on this,this report compared four payment mechanisms including linear payment,ladder payment,tolerance payment,and punishment-after-tolerance payment to solve the problems of uneven risk sharing and opportunistic behavior of project companies. Furthermore,this report analyzed the current situation of rectification mechanism design in PPP projects from three aspects:the design of rectification index,the requirement of rectification time,and the strategy of deduction of rectification points,so as to provide theoretical guidance for the scientific and reasonable design of rectification mechanism.
<<