上海高院发布的典型案例展示了上海法院充分发挥司法裁判在培育和践行社会主义核心价值观方面的规范、引领和保障作用。但也暴露出运用社会主义核心价值观在民事裁判文书中释法说理还普遍存在性质认识不清、适用方法不当等问题。在宪法明确规定社会主义核心价值观后,逐渐有更多的法律将其列为立法目的。其在个案中的法源性质还需视具体核心价值观在规范性法律文件中的转化情况而定,其适用规则也应在此基础上构建。总体上,社会主义核心价值观与法律原则地位近似。可从确立原则、划分案件类型、明确规范地位、细分裁判情形、规范裁判修辞五个方面完善社会主义核心价值观融入司法判决的方法和路径。
<<The typical cases released by the Shanghai High Court show the Shanghai courts give full play to the normative,leading,and guaranteeing role of judicial adjudication in cultivating and practicing socialist core values. However,it also revealed that the use of socialist core values to interpret the law and reasoning in civil judgment documents still had problems such as nuclear understanding of nature and improper application methods. Since the constitution stipulated the socialist core values,more and more laws gradually have listed them for legislative purposes. The nature of its legal source in individual cases also depends on the transformation of specific core values in normative legal documents,and the socialist core values are similar to legal principles. It can improve the methods and paths of integrating socialist core values into judicial judgments from five aspects:establishing principles,classifying case types,clarifying normative status,subdividing adjudication situations,and standardizing adjudication language.
<<