By analyzing the procuratorial supervision work handled by the Third Branch of the Shanghai People’s Procuratorate in 2021，we can present the essence of the penetrating supervision of the procuratorate in the new era. The basic situation shows that the cases applying for supervision covers a wide range，and the fields of administrative duty performance and urban construction administrative compulsory fields are growing rapidly；the administrative subjects are widely distributed，and the cases in which district-level administrative organs are the defendants have exploded；Disputes originating from demolition are in the first place. Among the cases applying for supervision，the number of cases in which the court’s decision confirms that the administrative organ has violated the procedures has increased. “Five violations and four must” rectification and “demolition disputes” are two types of regional key types of cases. At the same time，the procedural norms of administrative acts highlighted by administrative law enforcement and trials need to be improved，the initiative of administrative organs to perform their duties needs to be further strengthened，the ability of administrative organs to collect and fix evidence needs to be strengthened，and the initiative of administrative organs to substantively resolve disputes related issues that should be paid attention to and improved. The main practices and results of penetrating supervision of administrative procuratorial organs include establishing a ledger of the substantive causes of cases，establishing a mechanism for separating complicated and simple cases，giving play to the role of an integrated mechanism，and improving the uniformity of judgment and interpretation of similar administrative cases. In the next stage，the new pathway to strengthen the substantive resolution of administrative disputes，and promote administration and trial according to law，is adhere to both procedures and entities to improve the standardization of administrative behaviors，and the courts should further enhance the unity of interpretation and reasoning in similar cases，establish a platform for resolving multiple administrative disputes，and focus on joint efforts to promote substantive administrative resolution.