本报告为便于分析、对比,沿用2019年中医药教育评价报告6个指标体系与权重,以31个省(区、市)为研究对象,对中医药教育发展情况进行了综合评价。2019年综合评价排名前三的为北京市、广东省、上海市;西部地区平均排名有所提高,但东部地区综合评价排名优于中、西部地区;提出建设“中医药强省”目标队伍进一步壮大,扩增至19个省(区、市),其中医药教育水平明显高于未提出建设“中医药强省”目标的省(区、市),且高于全国平均水平,但平均排名有所下降。本报告指出,排名有所下降的省(区、市)应当加强自查自省,汲取国内中医药教育先进经验,扩大中医药高等人才培养规模,重视各类培养基地的建设和申报工作;排名有所提升或排名较高的省(区、市)应当进一步发挥优势、补齐短板,发挥以点带面的作用,带动全国中医药教育水平提升。
<<In order to facilitate analysis and comparison,this report uses the 6 indicators and weights of the 2019 traditional Chinese medicine education evaluation report,and takes 31 provinces (regions,cities) as the research objects to comprehensively evaluate the development of Chinese medicine education. The results show that the top three in the comprehensive evaluation are Beijing,Tianjin,and Shanghai;the average ranking of the western region has been improved,but the comprehensive evaluation ranking of the eastern region is better than that of the central and western regions;the team of strong provinces of traditional Chinese medicine has further grown to 19. These provinces (regions,cities) are significantly better than those that have not proposed the goal of building a “strong province in traditional Chinese medicine”,and are better than the national average,but the average ranking has declined. This report believes that provinces (regions,cities) whose rankings have fallen should strengthen self-examination and introspection,absorb advanced domestic Chinese medicine education experience,expand the scale of training advanced Chinese medicine talents,and attach importance to the construction and application of various training bases. The provinces (regions,cities) that are promoted or ranked higher should further exert their advantages,make up for their shortcomings,and play a point-by-point role to promote the improvement of the traditional Chinese medicine education level.
<<