在行政协议的相关案例中,人民法院以不同的裁判说理展现了不同的立场,揭示了法院在依法行政与契约严守、法律优位与法安定性等原则间的权衡,体现了行政协议案件的复杂性。行政协议的识别、行政协议无效认定、行政协议的单方变更与解除、行政协议的赔偿等问题,归根结底是行政法律规范与民事法律规范的适用问题,如何调和公私法适用是行政协议司法审查的核心。因此,以人民法院的裁判文书为分析样本,对行政协议案件的裁判观点进行归纳分析,不仅有助于行政协议的理论提升,而且有助于提升法院裁判质量,维护司法权威,具有重要的理论意义和实践意义。
<<In the relevant cases of administrative agreements,the people’s court showed different positions based on different theories,reflects the important balance of the court between administration by law and strict contract adherence,legal superiority and legal stability,and reveals the complexity of administrative agreement cases. The identification of administrative agreement,the invalidation of administrative agreement,the unilateral change and termination of administrative agreement,the compensation of administrative agreement,in the final analysis,are the application of administrative legal norms and civil legal norms. How to reconcile the application of public and private law has become the core of the judicial judgment of administrative agreements. Therefore,the judgment documents of the people’s court as the analysis samples and analysis of the judgment views of administrative agreement cases are not only conducive to the theoretical improvement,but also conducive to improve the quality of court judgment and maintain judicial authority,which is of great theoretical and practical significance.
<<Keywords: | State CompensationAdministrative AgreementAdministrative Advantage PowerAdministrative Agreement Is Invalid |