This paper focuses on the dispute resolution effect of administrative review system，and then implements observation and analysis with the empirical comparison method for the dispute resolution effect of litigation system，summarizes problems in the review and dispute resolution function，analyzes the reason，and puts forward the suggestions for improvement. As can be seen in the empirical analysis of data，administrative review system exerts an inferior effect in dispute resolution，failing to meet the political expectation of administrative review laws. It can be mainly reflected in the insufficient capacity to absorb disputes in the review system，the low force of review in operation，unrealistic review decisions and argumentation as well as the low level of “case settlement”. This is mainly caused by laying particular stress on the administrative elimination of loss and review disputes effect in the dimension of value，leaving blank in evidence and other basic system，resulting in insufficient credibility in the dimension of system，and failing to give full play to the effect due to the restricted power of the review authority in the dimension of organization. Finally，this paper puts forward the approaches for the improvement of proper judicialization，and discusses the specific routes based on logical analysis.