小额诉讼案件裁判文书改革是司法体制改革的一项重要内容。为准确把握最高人民法院制定的民事诉讼文书样式适用现状及实践中的问题,本文以中国裁判文书网为依托,选取127家繁简分流改革试点法院,从中抽取不同法官制作的807篇小额案件判决文书作为研究样本。通过逐篇分析发现,小额案件文书存在“样式推广缺乏动力、构成要素遭受质疑、文书制作繁简不当”等问题,并从主客观分析了问题成因。结合小额案件文书的多重功能,从仅保留令状式判决样式、探索试行民事判决证明书、极简风格的首部设计、简明准确的诉辩总结、简洁明快的裁判说理等方面,对小额案件文书的简化规则进行调整修正,并设计新的文书样式供审判实践参考使用。
<<The reform of judgment documents for small litigation cases is an important content in the reform of judicial system. To get the accurate information about the applicable format of civil litigation documents formulated by the supreme people’s court and the problems in practice,this paper selects 127 pilot courts implementing the division of complicated and simple procedures based on China Judgments Online,and then extracts 807 small claims case judgments made by different judges as the research samples. By analyzing these cases respectively,small claims case documents are found to be “insufficient in the promotion of format,questionable in components,and improper in preparation”,and then analysis is made on the problem both subjectively and objectively. Furthermore,in combination with multiple functions of small case documents,the rules on simplifying small claims case documents are adjusted and corrected from the perspective of keeping the writ-type judgment format,exploring trial civil judgment certificate,simple header design,concise and accurate pledging summary,simple and clear judgment argument,and then a new document format is designed for reference in trial practice.
<<Keywords: | Judicial ReformSmall Claims ProceduresFormat of Litigation DocumentsSimplification of Judgment Documents |