Within the above “three-in-one” governance framework of the rural collective economic organizations under the guidance of Party building，we established the rating system of governance of rural collective economy. Based on the village-wide data of the suburb Beijing，We carried out the evaluation analysis and an empirical test. The research findings are as follows：（1）Generally speaking，the overall governance system of collective economic organizations did not improve much in 2016-2018；the leading role of Party building scored the highest，and the vast majority of collective economic organizations were still in the primary stage of governance. （2）The governance of collective economic organizations was obviously polarized and relatively fixed. For example，the administrative areas or locales of the collective economic organizations in the top 100 and the bottom 100 were relatively fixed. （3）Fengtai District，Chaoyang District and Mentougou District had a relatively high level of comprehensive governance of collective economic organizations. In the urban-rural fringe areas，the collective economic organizations scored higher in Party building，community governance and comprehensive governance. （4）As the level of comprehensive governance of rural collective economic organizations improves，rural land rights will tend to be confirmed in the form of confirming rights and profits or confirming rights and shares，i.e. “unified”，rather than confirming rights and land in the form of “divided”. Party building，market governance，community governance and public governance all had a significant impact on the form of rural land use rights confirmation.