本报告从多源大数据角度呈现了我国文化和旅游融合产业发展的总体情况以及地区差异。从文旅融合产业发展综合指数来看,其涵盖6项二级指标、12项三级指标和42项四级指标。北京市和上海市的文旅融合产业发展综合指数位居全国前列,武汉市、成都市和西安市也实现了较好的文化和旅游产业融合发展。从分指标来看,文旅资源融合指数、文旅融合产业指数、文旅信息融合指数、文旅融合影响力指数、时代融合指数和文旅产业发展弹性指数权重分别为0。1348、0。2859、0。1756、0。2520、0。1287和0。0229。由本报告可知,地区间文旅融合产业的差异较大,文旅融合产业发展的抗风险能力差异较小。从地区差异来看,东部地区的文旅融合产业发展综合水平最高,其次是中部地区和西部地区,东北部地区发展水平较低。
<<From the perspective of multi-source big data,this report presents the overall situation and regional differences of the integration and development of culture and tourism in China. From the comprehensive index of cultural and tourism integration industry,it covers 6 secondary indicators,12 tertiary indicators and 42 fourth-level indicators. Beijing and Shanghai are in the forefront of the development of cultural and tourism integration,while Wuhan,Chengdu and Xian have also achieved better integration of cultural and tourism industries. From the sub-indicators,the weights of cultural and tourism resources integration index,cultural tourism integration industry index,cultural tourism information integration index,cultural tourism integration influence index,times integration index and cultural tourism industry development elasticity index account for 0.1348,0.2859,0.1756,0.2520,0.1287 and 0.0229 respectively. It can be seen from the report that there are great differences in the integration of cultural tourism industry among regions,and there is little difference in the anti-risk ability of cultural tourism industry development. From the perspective of regional differences,the comprehensive development level of cultural and tourism integration industry in the eastern region is the strongest,followed by the central and western regions,and the development level in the northeast region is weak.
<<Keywords: | Regional DifferenceCultural and Tourism Integration IndustryIntegration of Cultural and Tourism Resources |