为平衡好版权人与信息定位服务提供者之间的权利和义务关系,我们亟待厘清后者在版权侵权责任认定过程中避风港规则的适用条件和适用争议问题。本文认为信息定位服务提供者以外的第三人实施直接侵权行为是适用该规则的前提条件,信息定位服务提供者无主观过错则是其适用的实质条件。目前,是否所有类型的链接均适用“通知—删除”规则、信息定位服务提供者接到版权人通知后“及时”采取必要措施的时间标准是什么、版权人的不合格通知能否证明信息定位服务提供者主观上存在过错等问题是避风港规则在司法实践中面临的主要争议问题。
<<In order to balance the rights and obligations between the copyright owner and the information location service provider,we urgently need to clarify the application conditions and application disputes of the safe harbor rules in the process of determining the responsibility of copyright infringement. This article believes that direct infringement by a third party other than the information location service provider is the prerequisite for the application of this rule,and the fact that the information location service provider has no subjective fault is the substantive condition for its application. At present,whether all types of links are applicable to the “notification-delete” rule,what is the time standard for the information location service provider to “timely” take necessary measures after receiving the copyright owner’s notification,and whether the copyright owner’s unqualified notification can prove the subjective faults of information location service providers are the main controversial issues faced by the safe harbor rules in judicial practice.
<<