您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    在民主法治的轨道上推动改革开放——广东法治建设的成就与挑战

    摘要

    改革开放以来,广东在30多年时间内长期扮演试点先锋的角色,在很多领域中不仅为自身的发展探索道路,也为兄弟省市的发展起到“先行先试”的示范作用。广东建立并不断完善依法治省工作体制和机制,形成了党委统一领导、人大协调主导、“一府两院”组织实施、政协民主监督、广大人民群众有序政治参与的依法治省“广东模式”。广东经验显示,只有在民主法治轨道上推动改革开放,妥善地协调和化解各类矛盾,勇于“先行先试”,才能让最广大人民群众成为改革开放最大的受益者。 <<
    >>

    Abstract

    For over 30 years since the implementation of the policy of reform and opening-up, Guangdong Province has always played the role of the experimenter and pioneer in the reform and opening-up, exploring new roads of development not only for itself, but also for other provinces. Under the correct leadership of successive provincial party committees, with the concerted efforts of government officials and the general public in the whole province, and through the establishment and improvement of various systems and mechanisms, it has established a "Guangdong Mode" of administration of the province by law, which is under the unified leadership of the Provincial Party Committee, coordinated and guided by the Provincial People's Congress, implemented by the Provincial People's Government, the Provincial People's Court and the Provincial People's Procuratorate, democratically supervised by the Provincial Committee of Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, and orderly participated by the broad masses of the people. The Guangdong experience shows that only by implementing the policy of reform and opening-up within the orbit of democracy and the rule of law, properly handling and resolving various conflicts, and having the courage to explore and experiment, can the government truly make the broad masses of people the biggest beneficiaries of reform and opening-up. <<
    >>
    作者简介
    中国社会科学院法学研究所法治国情调研组:调研组负责人: 田禾, 中国社会科学院法学研究所。调研组成员: 陈欣新、吕艳滨、翟国强、王小梅。执笔人: 陈欣新、田禾, 中国社会科学院法学研究所。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告