2019年传统音乐类非遗项目的保护、传承与发展具有三大显著趋向。其一,从“非遗传承”来看,本年度在常规推进“个体性”传承人培训的同时,通过学术讲座、专项培养、校园展示等方式,更多兼顾了大学生、中小学生等“群体性”传承人的培养。其二,从“非遗传播”来看,本年度通过各级各类“走出去”与“请进来”的文化交流;“媒体性”与“表演性”的文化传播;“论坛性”与“雅集性”的文化展示等,进一步促进了特定非遗对象的文化交流与传播。其三,从“非遗研究”来看,本年度167部学术论著的出版和154篇学术论文的刊发,从学理分析、理论建构与规律揭示等角度进一步论述了特定非遗对象的本体特征及文化内涵等。传统音乐类非遗项目的保护、传承与发展也面临着新的机遇和挑战,需要在“非遗传承”的实践方式上实现从“提量”向“提质”的进阶;需要在“非遗传播”的文化理念上实现从“代表性传播”向“普及性传播”的转化;需要在“非遗研究”的学术观念上实现从“音乐本位”向“非遗本位”的转向。
<<There are three significant trends in the protection,inheritance and development of intangible cultural heritage of traditional music in 2019.
First of all,from the perspective of the inheritance of intangible cultural heritage. This year we not only promoted the training of “individual” inheritorson a regular basis,but also conducted more training of “group” inheritors such as college students and primary and middle school students,through academic lectures,special training and campus exhibitions.
Secondly,from the perspective of the spread of intangible cultural heritage. This year through all levels of “go out” and “please come in” cultural exchanges;The cultural communication of “media” and “performance”;“Forum” and “elegant collection” cultural display,etc. It further promotes the cultural exchange and dissemination of specific intangible cultural heritage objects.
Thirdly,from the perspective of intangible cultural heritage research. This year,167 academic works and 154 academic papers were published. These academic achievements further discusses the ontological features and cultural connotations of specific intangible cultural heritage objects From the theoretical analysis,theoretical construction and law revealed.
With the coming of the 14th five-year plan,the protection,inheritance and development of intangible cultural heritage of traditional music are also facing new opportunities and challenges. It is necessary to realize the step from “quantity” to “quality” in the practical way of immaterial cultural heritage inheritance. It is necessary to realize the transformation from “representative communication” to “universal communication” in the cultural concept of “transmission of intangible cultural heritage”. It is necessary to turn from “music standard” to “intangible cultural heritage standard” in the academic concept of intangible cultural heritage research.
<<