In August 2020，the project team evaluated the information on the websites of the discipline inspection and supervision commissions of randomly selected 54 prefecture level cities. It concludes that the construction of the public platform was relatively standardized，the information disclosure in key areas was sufficient and widely reported，the efforts of institution and policy interpretation have been continuously increased，and the information disclosure of inspection and supervision was persistently promoted. At the same time，some problems still exist in the construction of the discipline inspection and supervision websites of prefecture level cities，including inadequate information disclosure，incomplete policies and regulations disclosure，insufficient work report disclosure，unavailable punishment decisions，and insufficient interaction with the public. In December，the project team once again evaluated the discipline inspection and supervision websites of the above 54 evaluation objects，and compared the evaluation data with those in August. It turns out that the scores of the vast majority of the evaluation objects had been greatly increased，indicating that the information disclosure work of the municipal discipline inspection and supervision commissions has been constantly improving. However，the project team finds that the municipal discipline inspection and supervision websites are not inclusive enough in disclosing the inspection information from the superior. It is suggested that the timeliness of information disclosure should be strengthened，comprehensiveness of information disclosure should be enhanced，more attention should be paid on key areas and key information disclosure，and the proportion of public interaction in information disclosure should be increased.