单一的法律规范体系无法完成社会治理这一系统工程,需要民间规范发挥补充作用;地方立法活动与民间规范在调整对象、调整事项、调整路径等诸多方面存在重合,二者之间存在互动的可能性与必要性。民间规范为地方立法活动提供立法事实、增进立法特色,地方立法活动则规范引导民间规范;当然,二者也存在规则竞争的可能性。本文通过对有关民间规范的地方性法规文本的考察,发现现阶段二者在实践中的互动并未发挥实质性作用,并存在价值观念的冲突对立。明确地方立法与民间规范各自的调整范围,平衡协调二者的关系,才能促进我国的法治发展。
<<One single system of legal norms is unable to complete the systematic project of social governance,which requires the folk norms to play a complementary role;in addition,local legislative activities and folk norms overlap in many aspects such as adjustment objects,adjustment items and adjustment paths,so there is possibility and necessity for the interaction between them. Folk norms can provide legislative facts and add legislative features for local legislative activities,while local legislative activities may guide and regulate folk norms. Certainly,there may also be competition between the two sets of rules. Through the investigation of the text of local laws and regulations related to folk norms,it is found that the interaction between the two in practice does not play a substantive role at the present stage,and exists conflict of values. Therefore,only by clarifying the respective adjustment scope of local legislation and folk norms and balancing and coordinating the relationship between them can we promote the development of the rule of law in China.
<<