您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    20世纪90年代~2018年我国地方立法与民间规范互动的必要性、现状及对策

    摘要

    单一的法律规范体系无法完成社会治理这一系统工程,需要民间规范发挥补充作用;地方立法活动与民间规范在调整对象、调整事项、调整路径等诸多方面存在重合,二者之间存在互动的可能性与必要性。民间规范为地方立法活动提供立法事实、增进立法特色,地方立法活动则规范引导民间规范;当然,二者也存在规则竞争的可能性。本文通过对有关民间规范的地方性法规文本的考察,发现现阶段二者在实践中的互动并未发挥实质性作用,并存在价值观念的冲突对立。明确地方立法与民间规范各自的调整范围,平衡协调二者的关系,才能促进我国的法治发展。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    One single system of legal norms is unable to complete the systematic project of social governance,which requires the folk norms to play a complementary role;in addition,local legislative activities and folk norms overlap in many aspects such as adjustment objects,adjustment items and adjustment paths,so there is possibility and necessity for the interaction between them. Folk norms can provide legislative facts and add legislative features for local legislative activities,while local legislative activities may guide and regulate folk norms. Certainly,there may also be competition between the two sets of rules. Through the investigation of the text of local laws and regulations related to folk norms,it is found that the interaction between the two in practice does not play a substantive role at the present stage,and exists conflict of values. Therefore,only by clarifying the respective adjustment scope of local legislation and folk norms and balancing and coordinating the relationship between them can we promote the development of the rule of law in China.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    李洋:李洋,重庆市地方立法研究协同创新中心、西南政法大学立法科学研究院研究人员,研究方向:法学理论、立法学。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告