近年来,学界一直对地方立法存在“立法重复”的担忧,而要验证这一担忧多大程度上存在则必须对地方性法规重复率进行科学的计算,但目前学界尚未明确统一合理的评估标准。实际上,立法重复问题的本质是地方立法一致性和特色性双重价值的冲突,这是构建科学评估标准不可忽视的地方。本文在贯彻平衡双重价值的原则下尝试提出地方性法规重复立法的评估标准,以此为基础对17部省级市容环卫地方性法规进行了文本分析。分析结果显示,17部法规均存在重复率偏高、创新性较差、未能充分体现地方特色的问题。其原因在于地方立法双重价值的失衡,因此,要破解地方立法高重复率问题,必须在优化地方性法规的结构、内容、工作机制时坚持对双重价值的兼顾和平衡,“对症下药”提高地方立法质量,突出地方立法特色。
<<In recent years,the academic community has been concerned about the existence of “legislative duplication” in local legislation. To verify the extent of this concern,it is necessary to calculate the repetition rate of local laws and regulations scientifically,but at present,the academic community has not yet clearly unified and reasonable evaluation criteria. In fact,the essence of the problem of legislative repetition is the conflict of the dual values of the consistency and characteristics of local legislation,which is the place that can not be ignored in the construction of scientific evaluation standards. Based on the principle of balancing the dual values,this paper tries to put forward the evaluation criteria of repeated legislation of local laws and regulations,and on this basis,analyzes the text of 17 provincial local laws and regulations on city appearance and environmental sanitation. The analysis results show that 17 laws and regulations have the problems of high repetition rate,poor innovation and insufficient local characteristics. The reason lies in the imbalance of the dual value of local legislation. Therefore,in order to solve the problem of high repetition rate of local legislation,it is necessary to adhere to the balance of dual value when optimizing the structure,content and working mechanism of local laws and regulations,improve the quality of local legislation and give full play to the characteristics of local legislation.
<<