您好,欢迎来到皮书数据库!
热点推荐: 双循环
更多>> 课题组动态
更多>> 皮书作者
谢伏瞻
    中国社会科学院学部委员,学部主席团主席,研究员,博士生导师。历任中国社会科学院院长、党组书记,国务院发展中心副主... 详情>>
蔡 昉
    中国社会科学院国家高端智库首席专家,学部委员,学部主席团秘书长,研究员,博士生导师。先后毕业于中国人民大学、中国... 详情>>
李培林
    男,汉族,出生于1955年5月,山东济南人,博士,研究员,全国人民代表大会社会建设委员会副主任委员,中国社会科学... 详情>>

    2000~2020年我国民事电子送达的实践困境与规范进路

    摘要

    2012年修正的《民事诉讼法》正式从立法层面确立了电子送达的法律地位。作为一种新兴送达方式,电子送达被认为是提升司法效能、破解“送达难”的重要手段。但受制于制度设计、数据衔接、技术瓶颈、资金保障等因素,电子送达存在“找不到”“送不到”“送达有效性存疑”等问题,尚不能有效满足司法的实际需求,仍有较大优化空间。本文立足当前电子送达的司法实践现状,并结合各地法院出台的电子送达规范性文本,从规范性文本视角分析梳理电子送达存在的实践问题,以期提出符合司法规律的规范进路。

    <<
    >>

    Abstract

    The Civil Procedure Law revised in 2012 formally established the legal status of electronic means of service from the legislative level. As a new method of service,electronic service is considered to be an important means to improve judicial efficiency and solve the “difficulty in service”. However,due to the influence of system design,data connection,technical bottlenecks,and financial guarantees,such problems as “cannot be found,” “delivery unreached,” and “questionable service validity” have been existing in electronic service,resulting in its failure to effectively meet the actual needs of justice. So,there is still a large space for optimization. Based on the current judicial practice of electronic service,and combined with the normative text of electronic service issued by local courts,this paper analyzes and sorts out the practical problems of electronic service from the perspective of the normative text so as to propose a standardized approach that conforms to judicial laws.

    <<
    >>
    作者简介
    刘文添:刘文添,广州互联网法院审判管理办公室(研究室)法官助理。
    <<
    >>
    相关报告