在PPP争议数量逐步上升的背景下,厘清PPP合同的法律性质及其争议的解决途径,对化解争议、推进PPP模式发展具有重要意义。《最高人民法院关于审理行政协议案件若干问题的规定》虽然没有完全封堵通过民事诉讼或仲裁程序解决PPP争议的渠道,但其留下的空间已非常狭窄;该解释规定的协议管辖、多重救济机制、民事法律规范等措施能否有效地保护社会资本方的权益,尚需观察。在现有法律制度体系短期内无法做出突破性规定的情况下,社会资本方可以对PPP合同进行拆分,设置不同的争议解决方式。为保障PPP模式的顺利发展,需要立法机关、司法机关、政府方和社会资本方共同努力。
<<In the context of the increasing number of PPP disputes,it is of great significance to clarify the legal nature of PPP contracts and the ways to resolve disputes,so as to resolve disputes and promote the development of PPP model. Although the “Regulations on Several Issues in the Hearing of Administrative Agreement cases” does not completely block the channels for resolving PPP disputes through civil litigation or arbitration procedures,the space left behind is already very narrow. It remains to be seen whether measures such as agreement jurisdiction,multiple relief mechanisms,and civil legal norms provided by the interpretation can effectively protect the rights and interests of social capital parties. In the case where the existing legal system cannot make breakthrough provisions in the short term,the social capital party can split the PPP contract and set up different dispute resolution methods. In order to ensure the smooth development of the PPP model,it requires the joint efforts of the legislature,the judiciary,the government and the social capital.
<<Keywords: | Judicial InterpretationAdministrative LitigationAdministrative AgreementSubstantive ReviewPPP Contracts |