“Administrative decision-making” includes five secondary indicators，“legal decision-making”，“scientific decision-making”，“democratic decision-making”，“scientific decision-making” and “decision tracking”，which are divided into eight specific observation points，which are useful for government agencies in administrative decision-making. To conduct a macro inspection. The evaluation found that the degree of standardization in the area of administrative decision-making has been significantly improved，the implementation of various systems has been significantly improved and increasingly refined，democratic decision-making has been further implemented，the information tracking system after major decisions has been improved and the tracking of decision-making has improved significantly，and the results and basis of decision-making have been disclosed In good condition. But at the same time，it is found that there are still problems in the area of administrative decision-making that the degree of attention to administrative decision-making in the process of building a government under the rule of law is far from enough，the decision-making mechanism is not yet sound，the decision-making procedure is still not standardized，and the quality and efficiency of decision-making need to be further improved. The evaluation suggests that the legality review system for major decisions should be implemented，and efforts should be made to improve the scientific nature of administrative decision-making，further improve the level of democratic decision-making，and achieve full disclosure of administrative decision-making.