公共文化场馆是彰显居民生活品质与地方文化服务能力的空间载体,其供给数量、质量与供需关系是表征城市公共治理水平的重要指标。以杭州为例,解构公共文化场馆的供需现状,剖析居民的休闲行为倾向,研究发现:杭州市公共文化场馆高度集中于主城区,新城与郊县(区、市)公共文化场馆建设滞后,公共文化场馆存在四种“地方—场馆”模式;本地居民对公共文化场馆偏好具有低年龄分型性,居民对图书馆与博物馆休闲表现出高偏好度与高满意度;居民参与公共休闲的主要目标是“学习”与“娱乐”,公共文化场馆亟须强化社会交往与健康服务功能;居民对公共文化场馆的硬件满意度普遍高于软件环境,亟须提升公共文化场馆的服务与管理能力;时空间可获性、居住时间、文化水平、收入水平是影响居民公共休闲行为的主要因素。为进一步提高公共文化场馆的供给质量,增进居民休闲福祉,应优化公共场馆布局,分区分类实施公共休闲服务能力战略,提高公共文化场馆的可获性,加强公共文化场馆的内涵建设。
<<Public cultural venues are the space carriers to show the quality of life of residents and the ability of local cultural services. The quantity and quality of supplication and supply-demand relationship of public cultural venues are indicators of urban public governance. With Hangzhou as the case,this paper demonstrates the supply and demand of public cultural venues and analyzes residents’ leisure behavior tendency. The results show that:①The public cultural venues in Hangzhou are still highly agglomerated in the downtowns,which can be divided into four “local-venue typed models” according to the relationship between economic development and the layout of public cultural venues;②There is indistinct age differentiation for residents’ preference for public leisure,while there is distinct age differentiation for other kinds of motivation. And residents have higher satisfaction on the public libraries and museums than other cultural revenues;③The main objectives of residents’ participation in public leisure are “to learn” and “to recreate”,while the functions of promoting public communication and public health are not well-developed;④The residents are highly satisfied with the built environment of public cultural venues and lowly satisfied with the management,service and distinction of cultural venues. The influencing factors are the temporal and spatial inaccessibility of public cultural venues,the length of residence,educational level and income. Therefore,it’s imperative to optimize the layout of public cultural venues by implementing the regionalization and classification strategy,the accessibility strategy and quality strategy.
<<