2019年12月11日,WTO上诉机构事实上进入停摆状态,WTO多边体制下贸易争端解决前景不明。为应对这种局面,欧盟从多边、双边与诸边以及单边层面提出了多种应对方案。欧盟在尽力推动恢复上诉机构正常运行的同时,还提出了临时性上诉仲裁安排,试图尽可能维持WTO争端解决的主要特征与有效性,同时还通过修订立法推出了单边应对之策,以维护欧盟在国际贸易项下的经济利益。欧盟应对上诉机构停摆的方案是迄今为止最为充分、最为完备的,但尚不足以解决上诉机构面临的根本性危机,临时性上诉仲裁安排能否得到广泛的支持并发挥作用,尚待观察,而单边方案则有可能带来新的冲突。
<<On 11 December 2019,the WTO Appellate Body (AB) stopped functioning de facto for lacking of sufficient AB members,which made the future of trade dispute settlement under WTO system uncertain. To respond to this crisis,the EU brought forward several plans at different levels. While trying to reform and save the AB,the EU proposed ad hoc appeal arbitration arrangement which was designed to maintain the major characteristics and advantages of WTO trade dispute settlement mechanism. In addition,the EU tried to protect its economic interests derived from international agreements by unilateral legislative measures. In general,the EU’s responding measures to the WTO AB’s lockout are by far the most comprehensive among stakeholders,however,the EU’s efforts are still insufficient to solve the fundamental crisis of the AB. On the one hand,it is unsure if the ad hoc appeal arrangement will be well accepted or be effective,on the other hand,the EU’s unilateral measures may cause new conflicts with its trade partners.
<<